View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 14-11-2005, 08:20 PM
ShadowMarth's Avatar
ShadowMarth ShadowMarth is offline
Wizard Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Tennessee, USA
Posts: 6,694
Rep Power: 10
ShadowMarth is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to ShadowMarth Send a message via MSN to ShadowMarth
PopSci's 100 "Best Innovations" of the Year

Yep, I'm being as picky as possible about these things these days, but I'm not unjustified, especially with statements as erroneous as the ones found here. In advance, I'd like to say that I normally love Popular Science, but this is kind of rediculous.

Let's start off with the Gadgets award. PSP. Yeah, right. Never mind the fact that it didn't actually release this year, never mind the fact that it's been getting a spanking in sales from the DS (much less even mention it), and never mind that they've been purposefully crippling homebrew, one of the main points of the article. They still gave it to them.

For best Home Entertainment they gave it to the 360. Ok, people, stop giving a system that's not out yet "Of the year" awards. It's pointless. That's not all though, the real kicker is the absolutely ignorant "facts" cited in the article:

Quote:
As the first of the next-gen gaming consoles (Sony's PlayStation 3 and a system from Nintendo are expected next year), the Xbox 360 easily maintains the cred the original Xbox earned in 2001 when it crushed rival playstation with superior graphics and performance. This time though, it's not just about the games -- the 360 is poised to take over the living room as well.
The rest is just about the media options, specs, and HDTV capability.

Let's start with a more minor transgression, the statement "and a system from Nintendo" seriously minimalizes it. Second, and absolute worse transgression, "... the original Xbox earned in 2001 when it crushed rival plastation with superior graphics and performance." Let me think about this... NO! The playstation readily spanked both the GC and the Xbox without much effort. Oh, and I just love this part.

"This time though, it's not just about the games."

Wait, wait, wait. The Xbox had much less impressive games than the PS2 in general opinion. Also, I didn't see them mention a single game, just say that it crushed it with it's graphics, which is far from the truth. Perhaps they should have gotten someone with actual gaming experience to write this little segment?
__________________


Pokemon Pearl FC: 0430 4841 8934
Reply With Quote