View Single Post
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 15-11-2006, 07:58 PM
nmaster64's Avatar
nmaster64 nmaster64 is offline
Heavens Piercing Admin
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NCSU
Posts: 1,868
Rep Power: 5
nmaster64 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to nmaster64 Send a message via MSN to nmaster64 Send a message via Yahoo to nmaster64
Quote:
Originally Posted by leafgreen386
Count the number of buttons on the GCN controller. With various combinations of these buttons you can produce any attack or movement command, correct? Now, consider how many different things you will likely be able to do with the wiimote - you can move it slowly, you could jerk it, and it's location will probably matter. If you're required to move the wiimote in a certain way to preform various attacks, you instantly lose precision. What if your hand is trembling while you're trying to execute an attack that requires you to have it in an exact position? I haven't used the wiimote yet, and I'm sure they've built in some leeway, but a limited number of buttons executed in a planned order is 100% more precise than being able to move a controller in any direction and yield different results. It's a cool technology, but not for a fighting game.
PROVE. IT.

You sure make a lot of assumptions for someone who hasn't even used the Wiimote. Many reviewers have said that motions on the Wii often feel MORE fluid and quick to execute. Sure, you would think a button press would represent that fastest possible execution, but your only looking at one dimension of it. Taking numerous things into account, the Wiimote has has more potential than a standard controller, and your theories are baseless.

If everyone's using the same control, the best player is still going to win, right? Sounds to me like you just lack da skillz...

Again, who wins is less important than how much fun you have...and DBZ fans (at least ones that aren't pussies) should have more fun with the Wii controls than standard controls...
__________________

Last edited by nmaster64; 15-11-2006 at 08:03 PM.
Reply With Quote