|
I have BF1942, BF1942:SW, BFV, and BF2. I play both BF1942 and BF2 regularly, BF1942 being my favorite of the two. I have the Desert Combat (+Final) mod for BF1942, but I rarely play it anymore. I hate BF2142 because EA is clearly juicing it too far, I liked the realistic and historical feel of the previous games in the series and going into the future like that just ruins that feel.
I got BF1942 for Christmas of 2002, the same year it was released, because The Screen Savers on TechTV was playing it on their LAN Party and it looked really fun (as it has proven to be for about 5 years). Not many current BF1942 players have had it for that long.
I don't really like the idea of having an official clan for a PC game, let alone a clan for anything seeing how our DS clans failed miserably. I'd rather we just put together some sort of group communication standard for us to use, much like a clan but without calling ourselves a clan, or at least not a TDS clan. It's clear that if we want to work like a clan, we'll need to communicate like a clan, that means using voice chat while we play and maybe even when we aren't playing. I would obviously be doing the voice server stuff since I seem to be the only one that cares anyway.
As far as who leads, I don't think it's necessary if we're just a group of friends that play together. If we want to operate almost exactly like a clan and have a leader, I say we go with whoever has the most experience out of all the people that have all or the most of the games we intend to play (BF1942 and BF2 is what I understand), or we could have a leader for each game. We should decide on the games we play based on the percentage of group members that have which games, like 75% of members need to have a game for it to be official for our group. At least for now we intend to stick with only the Battlefield series, right?
|