|
Evidence is not proof, get it right. I never said any of this was proof and I don't believe any of it is proof (it's sort of like creation vs. evolution, all evidence and no proof outside of those directly involved). So far the only "evidence" you blew out of the water was the stuff that came from my own flawed memory of the incident, you haven't done anything to put as much as a dent in what the conspiracy theorists think.
I never said anything about the two towers being evidence, the evidence on those are too weak for me to go into a debate on them. I've actually found myself being critical about many of the conspiracy theories involving the towers. If you really want to convince me that the planes crashing into the towers caused them to fall, you need to go into details such as the actual burning temperature of the jet fuel and melting point of the steel and all that stuff you probably have no clue about. Your explanation about the planes causing them to fall would really only be obvious if they caused such a violent hit that the towers tipped over right when it happened. As far as the towers go, I'm stuck in the middle between believing the story and the theories. It probably wouldn't take a whole lot to convince me either way, but the rest of the stuff is where the evidence hits hard and I want to see if anything hits back.
What I want you to point out, by intelligent analysis, is how WTC7 fell and how 2 planes literally disappeared with nearly no trace of a plane aside from small scraps and one of them leaving meager damage on a building it flew into. I don't want any "because it was on fire" or any of that, I want you to try to convince me that it wasn't really a conspiracy, which basically means you'll probably need to get as detailed as I have been. If you know of a 1 or 2 hour video that defuncts the conspiracy theories, show me and I'll watch it.
I want to know the truth so that I could better support it, and by sparking an intelligently detailed debate, that might be achieved.
|