News Flash

[ShadowMarth]

Get your head out of your ass, Mormon. All you do is ***** when you're here now anyway.

As for your response, I don't entirely get it. So what was the motivation for keeping the WTC7 building quiet? If publicity was the goal, that would be the opposite thing they'd do...

[Pilot_51]

I'm not sure I understand what you're getting at. Keeping WTC7 quiet?
The publicity was purely for promotion of the war, the simple idea that terrorists attacked us. As I said, one guy owned all 3 buildings. WTC7 was mostly for the money, something on the side they saw they could take advantage of to increase profits, but I'm sure they were hoping for more damage from the falling debris so it wouldn't look so much like a set-up. The money part was what they had to make look like a coincidence and bring down the buildings as quietly as possible (without added noise from detonations, which I'm sure isn't hard to cover up at all), the war promotion was where they had to actually plan how the whole story unfolded. There are many things that just don't seem to fit together, or coincidentally hide important evidence to prove what really happened (such as the Pentagon). There's just too much actual evidence missing and too many coincidences for me to believe the story as the government tells it.

[Mormon]

Originally Posted by ShadowMarth

Get your head out of your ass, Mormon. All you do is ***** when you're here now anyway.

As for your response, I don't entirely get it. So what was the motivation for keeping the WTC7 building quiet? If publicity was the goal, that would be the opposite thing they'd do...

Weeeeeeeeeelllllll sorry but I find your reactions to what I do to be hilarious. Although shadow's reactions have been disappointing until now cause he seemed like he didn't care, but pilot didn't disappoint, lolz. As far as biggy goes, I dunno what is goin on in his head there so I don't bother =P

[Sepharite]

9/11 was a conspiracy just like the Holocaust never happened, and that Leprechauns actually exist.

Oh wait.

Anyways, some say that their "goal" was for 9/11 to blame someone, in order to get their oil. But that's a bunch of bull, imo. I didnt check out the stupid videos (cause I have a life) so I don't really care. xD

[/pointlesspost]

[ShadowMarth]

Well there's another point. Why would they blow up the pentagon? The world trade centers were MORE than enough to cause public sentiment, and hitting the pentagon would cause the military unnecessary troubles, and wouldn't generate nearly a fraction of the public sentiment that the WTCs did. Was their insurance nearly up too?

[Sepharite]

A worker there didn't like the colour of the walls so he blew it up. Simple renovation.

[Pilot_51]

My best guess for a reason is for the war promotion, they wanted the terrorist plan to be a big one which attacked major political and military landmarks. The damage was contained in a small portion of the Pentagon; from the sound of it only some offices were destroyed, so I don't really think it caused the military all that much trouble.
The story goes that they were sending 2 planes to attack the White House, but the one couldn't find it after circling the area a couple times and then decided to hit the Pentagon, while the other one was stopped by the passengers and flown straight into the ground in the middle of nowhere. It's not much for evidence, but is the White House really that hard to see from the air? I'm sure the terrorists would have some sort of reference of what it would look like while they were planning it, such as a flight sim or satellite images available online (it was before Google Earth, but there were other sites offering satellite imagery at the time). It just doesn't seem very likely that 2 planes targeting such a valuable landmark would be stopped not by military action, but by bad planning.

What puzzles me about that, or evidence that it wasn't a plane, is the video and the wreckage. The video shows the tip of something entering the view just before the frame showing the explosion, 747's don't have a tipped nose like that. If I remember correctly, only one man died at the Pentagon even though 3 of the walls were damaged; is it normal for the Pentagon to be so empty? The wall furthest in had a perfect circular hole knocked out of it, I sort of doubt a full-size commercial plane would do that, but I could expect that from a missile or maybe even a small jet plane. I saw no evidence of 747 wreckage, or even any wreckage that wasn't part of the building. I would also expect to see damage from the wings, but I saw none, and the wings on commercial jets are strong. Also, why did they do a sweep for every small bit of material in the lawn? They shouldn't need to do that unless they had something to hide. Wreckage from both the WTC and the Pentagon was whisked away to some unknown location rather than kept as evidence, and where's that black box from the Pentagon plane?

[Wraith]

Yeah...ll i got from that was Pentagon

[ShadowMarth]

It took me approximately fifteen seconds to find information contradicting that bull**** Pilot. Only three people died? Try 189. That's 64 on the plane and 125 in the buildings.

American Airlines Flight 77 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Mormon]

Dude don't get mad at pilot, you should have assumed that... I mean he took all the information in those videos as truth, so obviously he's got a lot of misinformation to sort out.