The Ps3 good and bad

[Wraith]

Developers liek the Wii more than the Ps3, and also do you know how many companys have moved out of sonys litlle box of bolts?
ALOT!

[Remas]

Oh you mean the comapnies that weren't able to make the best technology for PS3 by using it effieciency through the EEROM which is the icon that which uses mflops through the Magnetic bubbles which connects the Oasis through obscure optical numeral through the serial printer? Yeah I know they thought it was impossible so Sony made thmselves which all they had to do was connect the transversal wire with the unary wire.

So ps3 had the ordasity to make the PS3 just for us and you don't appreciate it. It costed them lots of money for those wires

[Pilot_51]

Magnetic bubbles, now that would be interesting.

[ShadowMarth]

... Remas? Are you still there? Or did your brain finally lose room for all the useless consciousness that is you due to expanding memory requirements?

[bignds]

Originally Posted by ShadowMarth

MGS may be multi-platform, and both of the others are.

I stopped listening here. Who ever can say Gran Turismo is going multi platform has gone crazy. Thats like Zelda on an Xbox.

Also, im debating whether to get a 360 or a PS3, PS3 seems more favorable at the moment, mainly because of the price cut, free online, built in wireless, which may i add, is appalling that the 360 doesn't, especially in this day and age and even more pathetic the Elite doesn't have this feature.

Even with you saying this game is going multi platform, that game is going multi platform; regardless, those games are still going on PS3.

For me to fully enjoy a 360, ill be paying around £80 extra; £50 for a wireless adapter and another £30 for subscription.

Im still wavering between the Xbox and PS3, and i'm looking at my options, but to be honest, I can't see what exclusives 360 has got for me. Halo 3 is ultimately a 'yah, cool' sorta game, if i have the means to play it, ill buy it. PS3 exclusives seem more promising to me.

And also Shadow, Sony has only ever been guilty of putting hardware before software on the PSP, and to an extent on the PS3. To say they did it with the PS1 is ignorant, and its actually easier to point the accusation at the N64 in this case. The whole cartridge saga is industry legend now.

[Remas]

Hey ShadowMarth I wouldn't say that do a computer geek like me. You are treating me like the luminance decay would to the sequencial data set.

[yez]

i applaude you remas!

[ShadowMarth]

Remas, you are insulting geeks of all types everywhere by calling yourself one. You're not a geek, you're not even a nerd. Both of those require a basic understanding of language. You are simply a moron and a loser.

And sorry that I'm not a racing game buff, Biggy, but I got it confused with other similar racing games. I am not a fan of such games. I apologize, but a simple error on ONE of the games is rather irrelevant. Everything else I said was true. And Sony is heavily suspect for placing hardware before software. On the PS2, they pushed their "emotion engine" onto consumers with the PS2 hoping it would catch on with other appliances. On the PSP they pushed the UMD, a major downfall of the PSP, and also their own Duo memory stick format. On the PS3, they are pushing the Cel Processor, which has led to developers everywhere calling the PS3 the most difficult to develop for, and they are also pushing Blu-Ray onto consumers, when Sony's new formats all inevitably fail. Of course, with the exception of the Memory Stick Duo, which simply plays second fiddle to the SD card.

[yez]

FIrst of all i dont understand why someone wants to be a geek and he got it from a stupid computer book!

[Wraith]

All Sony needs is one or 2 GREAT tiltes to be smash hits then more developers will get in!