Quote:
|
Originally Posted by x999x
If Nintendo made 5 DS and sold out 100%, by your logic, that would be better than that of the PSP's 160k units moved. Is this what you're honestly trying to tell me?
|
If Nintendo
expected (key word) to sell that many, than yes, it can be considered a success. If they made 5 units and sold that many, it means they sold as many as they expected, thus being good for them. Not a commercial success, but if they can sell everything that they make, then obviously they've done something well.
Quote:
|
I'm not misconstruing your post at all, but pointing out that percentages of product moved vs made doesn't account for the marketshare, of which Nintendo garnered 37%, while Sony only acquired 30%.
|
Like I said, I'm not speaking out on Nintendo's sales figures whatsoever, so stop trying to bring it up. I'm not looking at this being compared to any other topic. That's how you're misconstruing my post. I'm saying that
Sony sold almost as many units as they made within one day. That's by no means bad. Sure, overall they got beaten, but considering how many PSP's Sony made, they did extremely well. That's the point I'm trying to make. I'm not saying they're selling better than the DS, I'm just saying that calling the PSP had a low impact is wrong.