|
||
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which Company Handles Backward Capatability Better? | |||
| Nintendo |
|
16 | 59.26% |
| Sony |
|
9 | 33.33% |
| Microsoft |
|
2 | 7.41% |
| None |
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
I would guess, that if it isn't backwards compatable out of the box, you will be able to buy a third party attachment. I also wanted to suggest that the Nintendo Download service, is just Ninty version of http://www.gametap.com. I also wanted to remind you of Sega Channel http://www.sega-16.com/Feature-%20Sega%20Channel.htm ![]() Keep in mind this was 1993, so A FEW of you we're just born when this came out. But I've got a couple questions for you guys. 1) Assuming that Sega games can be downloaded to the revolution, will you now call it backwards compatable with SEGA Genesis? (why / why not) 2) Would you call this little device has limited backward compatability with Sega Genesis? (Why / why not) ![]() Quote:
__________________
www.gamblingsafetysystem.com ![]() ![]() Quote:
|
|
|||
|
mine is Nintendo becasue with the Rev. will ahve better backwards comaptabillity than all of them. I mean, they can't even get FULL backwards comaptabillity. For example, the 360, only a few select game are compatable. PS3 I think is the same way, but they still have some time to change it.
__________________
_____________________________________________ Wii owner:D Last edited by Mr.Cool; 26-03-2006 at 03:33 AM. |