 |
We need a new banner.... |
|
||
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which Company Handles Backward Capatability Better? | |||
| Nintendo |
   
|
16 | 59.26% |
| Sony |
  
|
9 | 33.33% |
| Microsoft |
  
|
2 | 7.41% |
| None |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
28-03-2006, 05:46 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
That's my personal understanding, but currently my stance is that PS1 and N64 are debatable, simply because the software is widely available in most GameStop's/EBgames. The hardware's discontinued, but the software is still available. However, the argument there is that they're all used games, thus, not technically retail (they're on the secondary market).
Definitly Legal: Arcade, Atari, NES, SNES, Genesis, Saturn, Game Boy, Game Boy Color, Game Gear, anything else pre-1996 Legal Gray Area: PS1, N64, Dreamcast Definitly Illegal: PC, PS2, Gamecube, Xbox, Xbox 360, DS, PSP, GB Personally, I wouldn't worry too much about the debatable ones. However, even if it is debatable, remember the ESA fights their debates with multi-million dollar lawyers...
__________________
Last edited by nmaster64; 28-03-2006 at 07:39 PM. 
|
|
28-03-2006, 12:43 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Gameboy/Color would not be legal. They can be played on a GBA/SP.
__________________
  Pokemon Pearl FC: 0430 4841 8934
|
|
28-03-2006, 09:02 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ah, yes, totally forgot that you could play them on the PS2.
__________________
Pokemon Pearl FC: 0430 4841 8934
|
Linear Mode
