ATTENTION: PLEASE READ

[Euan]

Can I just bump this so either Chuddy or Allen can answer my question?

For games like Spinter Cell etc, which none of you guys have (the 'reviewers' don't anyway) could you not get someone on the forums to review it, rather than just not having one. I imagine we should have reviews for near to every DS game out there, not just one or two of the bigger games which "everyone has".

I mean even if rather than Allen paying for full games, he kind of paid for half for some, or maybe helped a little bit towards much more games, it's a much more productive way of working things?

[chuddy_2001uk]

Thats a very good question Euan.

I definitely understand your point and I would be willing to accept review and make them official!

Just add a post onto this thread to request for a review!

Chuddy, why not make a new thread where members can request to get their reviews to be official?

;)

[Euan]

Good idea, DSD...

Well, for one, why not make my Another Code review official? It may not be particularly long, but without sounding big headed I think it's pretty good and goes over the basics, and of course it's better than having absolutely nothing.

Plus, it wouldn't be late simply because it's just released recently in America. Why not?

I just realised that my Another Code review has been deleted, god damn you ;), but oh well, in future I think reviews like that should be put up as official websites.

On the point of Allen paying for games, why not every so often (I don't know how much he spends on games), say how much he's willing to pay for a game. For example, even like £5 would go along way, because then games are only £20. Not a bad deal, if you don't mind me saying so...

[Lkr]

the review system should be like the news

[Euan]

I don't think it should be.

Nobody wants apparantly our best reviews to consist of any old, "yes this game is very good, the graphics are superb and music is good too. 8/10". We want decent enough reviews.

What I am saying is that there is a couple of reviews which could, and perhaps should, have been put on the main board in the old days of the forum before we lost most of the topics. X999X's Advance Wars review would be great for the website until Mormon did/finished his to name one example.

They still need to be quality, just not necessarily the same length and by one of the admin/mods...

[chuddy_2001uk]

Ok, If anyone has any reviews, send me them via PM or whatnot, email would be better. I can make them official if they are good enough.

As for the 5£ towards a game from Allen. Speak to the man yourself :D

[Euan]

Allen's been on a lot recently, so that's why I posted it here, Chuddy. It's a lot more productive. Put it this way, I think Mormon would have scraped together some coins for Advance Wars without Allen's help - and yet games like Splinter Cell (yes, I know he bought it for Dave, bad example), Bomberman etc have no reviews...

Also, what about games like Ultimate Spiderman? Fair enough, Chuddy, you, DSD, Allen, Mormon et all may not want it, but JIM2003 has it. Why can't he do it? I don't mean to sound so bossy etc but really, we could have a hell of alot of reviews up there, most of them quality ones too, if only people had the attitude 'it's better than nothing'. Even if JIM's review was crap (say the scenario went ahead), a crappy review telling readers of the basics, plus getting damn Meteos/Kirby off the homepage would be better than nothing!