'Strike' Response

[Dave]

Allen does now. I founded it :P

And I dont think we should strike on anything. I'll just push for improvments for everyone :) Its summer soon - i promise some improvments!

Yes, Allen owns the site.

[theONE]

take that lazy bum off his throne

Originally Posted by Dave

Allen does now. I founded it :P

And I dont think we should strike on anything. I'll just push for improvments for everyone :) Its summer soon - i promise some improvments!

Would you mind if I helped?

[Trentendo™]

You're from New Orleans don't say bum, say (can't say it)

[Ghaleon]

Originally Posted by Dave

I've said it before in threads and i'll repeat it here for you all to read:
As a site admin/mod i've just been hearing things about strikes and arguments.. exactly what is this about and who is causing it - why?

It seems signatures are causing most problems. I don't see why if we have an option to turn them on/off why you can't just all keep them as they are.

you're completely missing the point that mormon has been making.

he left because the members have no say at all on what happens. you guys just came out of the blue saying that you're gonna put limits on sigs and make them off by default.

he obviously has no urge to go to a forum where his opinion is not respected/acknowledged when changes are taking place. forums are normally all about the members. (and he was quite a big member...)

i think that statement about "thats what is going to happen, no arguements" was the final straw.

Originally Posted by Ghaleon

you're completely missing the point that mormon has been making.

he left because the members have no say at all on what happens. you guys just came out of the blue saying that you're gonna put limits on sigs and make them off by default.

he obviously has no urge to go to a forum where his opinion is not respected/acknowledged when changes are taking place. forums are normally all about the members. (and he was quite a big member...)

But our member's opinions ARE respected. It's just that they COMPLETELY misunderstood what we were going to do about the sigs. We never wanted to remove them completely in the first place.

[Dave]

Originally Posted by Ghaleon

you're completely missing the point that mormon has been making.

he left because the members have no say at all on what happens. you guys just came out of the blue saying that you're gonna put limits on sigs and make them off by default.

he obviously has no urge to go to a forum where his opinion is not respected/acknowledged when changes are taking place. forums are normally all about the members. (and he was quite a big member...)

Yes.. all our members have a say always. We never said turning off sigs by default, that was mis read.

I also said that I will personally respond to all members concerns. I respect members opinions and will help as much as I can to make sure people feel happy with the site.

[Sepharite]

Originally Posted by Ghaleon

you're completely missing the point that mormon has been making.

he left because the members have no say at all on what happens. you guys just came out of the blue saying that you're gonna put limits on sigs and make them off by default.

he obviously has no urge to go to a forum where his opinion is not respected/acknowledged when changes are taking place. forums are normally all about the members. (and he was quite a big member...)

Okay, just shut up! =) You're missing the entire point completely. It's an option. Now lets cut the crap.

edit: Aww.. DS dude beat us =( You got fast hands!

I'm super-ninja psycho fast. That, and I stayed in a Holiday Inn Express last night.