Xbox 360

[Euan]

Continuing on from my last post, the Xbox 360 launch list have continued to receive fairly good reviews, most around the 8 mark, which certainly isn't bad (considering non e has received 'ten' for graphics, so you can't say it's just because they're nice and shiny...)

Condemned got an 8.7 from IGN, while a solid 8 from Gamespot. Damn, that game looks awesome.

[Frisky_Biscuits]

This is what i say, F the 360 andevery next gen system, i am sticking with my computer for this wave of consoles. I work at best buy so i see COD2 alot on the 360 and i own the PC version, aside from a alittle more shine and heat waves on the desert level of the 360 there is no difference at all. also everyone knows that fps is better on computer as well as most other games and you don't have to pay to play online. just seeing u guys argue made me wanna type this up.

[Frisky_Biscuits]

oh and also for king kong, the only diff between the pc and 360 version was the shine on the rocks, and thats it.

[bignds]

Originally Posted by Urgh...RIP!!!

This is what i say, F the 360 andevery next gen system, i am sticking with my computer for this wave of consoles. I work at best buy so i see COD2 alot on the 360 and i own the PC version, aside from a alittle more shine and heat waves on the desert level of the 360 there is no difference at all. also everyone knows that fps is better on computer as well as most other games and you don't have to pay to play online. just seeing u guys argue made me wanna type this up.

Id kiss you if i could.
Post of the year right there.

I will only tune into opinions from people who have sat an Xbox 360 and a VERY high-end PC side by side and have seen both games played simultaneously. What you remember and what you see are two totally different things. Unfortunately, I believe I'm the only one here who has had such a viewing opportunity.

Although, the argument that FPS are best played on a PC is undebatable. Keyboard/mouse combo wins hands down. Kiosk demos are VERY different from the full retail versions of the same game.

Lack of credibility kills an argument.

[Frisky_Biscuits]

dude c mon, my computer is hella nice, not the best EVERYTHING but nice and i will give u an update and show u the kiosk is not that much different than the final game. companies have just gotten in the kiosks not that long ago and the 360 comes out on tuesday, do the math, that isnt very long for them to totally overhaul the game

Originally Posted by Urgh...RIP!!!

dude c mon, my computer is hella nice, not the best EVERYTHING but nice and i will give u an update and show u the kiosk is not that much different than the final game. companies have just gotten in the kiosks not that long ago and the 360 comes out on tuesday, do the math, that isnt very long for them to totally overhaul the game

The demo's were, if I was informed correctly, only the 75% version of the final look. They didn't "overhaul" the games, they just delivered what was currently compiled at the time.

Not that any of this matters, though. By Tuesday, I'll be enjoying Call of Duty 2 on my Xbox 360 in 720p on my 61" DLP.

Yeeeeaaaaaah.

[Frisky_Biscuits]

*sniff sniff* i smell a debate. if im wrong then im sry but i dont see how it would look any different than the demo. and y the hell do u wanna get the 360?

I smell a fanboy.

[ShadowMarth]

*Because it's pretty*

Of course, why that matters is beyond me.

Edit: OK, hold it here. He had as valid an argument as anyone, difference being only spelling mistakes. Fanboy? Lack of credibility? I smell a slightly overinflated ego and unwillingness to lose.